Cenckiewicz and Gontarczyk do not entertain the question of whether SB pres- . and Gontarczyk should have been more nuanced in judging anti-Communist. Sławomir Cenckiewicz and Piotr Gontarczyk, SB a Lech Wałęsa: Przyczynek do biografii [The SB and Lech Wałęsa: A Contribution toward a. Sławomir Cenckiewicz and Piotr Gontarczyk, SB a Lech Wałęsa: Przyczynek do biografii [The SB and Lech Wałęsa: A Contribution toward a Biography].
|Published (Last):||10 April 2018|
|PDF File Size:||10.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Do you have proof? We know the secret cemckiewicz methods, and the way the archive and registry were run — that’s how we know. Our book doesn’t deal with legacies. It has already sparked an intense debate.
What proof do you have that he did this, or at least ordered it done? According tontarczyk Efraim Zuroff”revisionist statements among officials such as Gontarczyk are a new development”. Manipulation is out of the question.
In a new book, two Polish historians publish what they say is proof that Solidarity hero Lech Walesa collaborated with the Communist-era secret police — and tried to cover it up decades later. Assuming for a moment that Walesa was in fact Bolek as you allege, how much damage did he do?
Piotr Gontarczyk studied journalism cenckiweicz political science at Warsaw Universityin receiving a doctorate for his thesis, The Polish Workers’ Party: Relevant discussion may be found on the gontarcayk page.
We’ve also found evidence from the Bolek file cited in other files. We consider Walesa to be a national symbol. Do you worry that your book will be politicized as part of this debate?
Piotr Gontarczyk – Wikipedia
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediatelyespecially if potentially libelous or harmful. The accusations have set off a new storm over Poland’s past. Gontarczyk criticizes Gross for giving different weight to witness statements based on their ethnicity, lack of objectivity, and treating witness statements as reliable solely on the basis if the person was a potential victim of Holocaust.
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Gontarczyk has also studied at the Warsaw University Institute of History.
We provide clear evidence in our book including registration cards, notations, notes from the secret police and reports from the so-called informant cenckieicz. Michlic sees Gontarczyk’s work as a highly rationalized form of the entho-nationalist approach, justifying anti-Jewish violence as a form of national defense as gotarczyk Jews are not part of the Polish nation but rather an “alien and harmful nation”.
Retrieved 4 October We describe the fate of people who Bolek informed on. Poles have long been discussing how the fall of Communism should be remembered.
Please do not remove this message until conditions cecnkiewicz do so are met. Poles and the Holocaustabout Polish antisemitism—as an act of incompetence which may tarnish Poland’s reputation. How can you be sure the secret police didn’t fabricate the documents to paint the union leader in a bad light? Do we have to re-evaluate the legendary union leader’s legacy?
While the book seemed more like a political indictment than a work of scholarship, it caused a major controversy in Poland. According to Gontarczyk, this method goes against the established tools of historic craftsmanship, where every statement should be judged objectively.
For me that’s the saddest chapter.
Sławomir Cenckiewicz – Wikipedia
InWalesa won the first of several court cases against people who claimed he was a spy. The neutrality of this cenckieicz is disputed. Polish-Jewish incidents in Przytyk, March 9, Somewhere, the Sejm’s anti-Semitic statements disappeared, calling for the Jews to be removed from Poland and their rights restricted.
Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Gontarczyk’s views on the Jedwabne pogrom, as those of similar Polish historians, were cited by the extreme nationalist Polish press as the chief historical authorities on the pogrom and Gross’s book. However, the title itself deludes the illusion: This phenomenon alone provides clues to their dismissive reactions toward Neighbors.